Wednesday, July 29, 2009

HUMP DAY GRAMMAR for July 29, 2009

OK--seriously, dude:

1) GROW A PAIR. Yeah, you heard me. All your sickeningly sweet chivalry-type nonsense is making me want to projectile vomit.

2. The sexiest guys are the ones who make fewest homonym errors.

3. This is a manakin (as opposed to a mannequin). And if you really want to see a website where these cute little creatures are dressed in lingerie...well, that's some messed up shit there, dude.

Happy Hump Day, you crazy kids! Please try to avoid finding any homonymically-challenged Hump Day partners. This has been a public service announcement from Red Pen, Inc.

10 comments:

Dave said...

I bet he doesn't even have a wife. He just wants to buy the lingerie for himself. All those pictures of real women probably intimidate him. No really, I think the ball-lacking personality of this guy annoyed me even more than the bad grammar.

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

LOL! It wouldn't surprise me at all if you're right about that...

Yvie said...

Mayhaps he is an aviphile. This IS the internet.

How does he watch tv, or react to billboards with sexy ladies on them? I have a mental image of him driving along, some sexy sign for swimwear appearing on the horizon and him averting his eyes and slamming into a telephone pole.

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

"Aviphile"...LOL!

Seriously, I'm stunned at this guy's prudishness. I wish I knew his e-mail address; I'd send him a link to all the RPI Hump Day Grammar posts just because giving him a culture shock like that could be really entertaining. ;)

LadyStyx said...

Entertaining culture shocks as well as a decent education.

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

I can't help picturing The 40-Year-Old Virgin when I think about what this dude must look/act like...

Bridgete said...

Um. Yeah. The lack of balls on this guy is really much more annoying than the grammar.

Besides...I really don't think it's useful at all to see lingerie on a mannequin. Most mannequins aren't chesty enough for lingerie displays, and even if they were, there's no way to know whether you're going to get the cleavage you want (if it's the kind that might provide cleavage, that is) because the boobs don't move!

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

I think lingerie on mannequins is kinda creepy--I mean, a lot of those mannequins are just, you know, bodies or torsos without heads! And there is no such thing as "dismemberment chic"...

Beacho said...

Christ...what a freak. I'm with Dave: the sissitude of the poster bothered me more than the grammar errors.

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

"Sissitude"...I love it!