Tuesday, March 17, 2009

TO/TOO/TWO TUESDAY for March 17, 2009


I guess this blogger figured that if he used each spelling of the word in question (principle and principal), he couldn't be completely wrong; in fact, he'd be half-right!

Unfortunately for him, a score of 50% still constitutes a FAIL.

8 comments:

Dave said...

That guy looks like his face should be on an Amber Alert somewhere...or maybe he's the the sex offender who touched the most children last year. I bet he would make Borat proud...

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

That's Anna Nicole Smith's ex-boyfriend. He's kind of a weird dude.

Bridgete said...

I see people using the two different spellings on the same document quite frequently, so I think your theory might be spot on.

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

Gotta love that 50% theory! :)

LadyStyx said...

Hmmm Principal is the person (pal being the reminder), but it seems to me that if you are enabling someone's nasty habit that could result in their ultimate demise, you aren't really a pal at all. Maybe that was their thinking when they wrote this?

.oO(Although I really am leaning towards that 50% theory too.)

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

Ha! Good theory, LadyStyx. But knowing who this blogger is (he has a history of using really rotten grammar)...I'm willing to bet that the 50% theory holds true here. ;)

ChicagoLady said...

Inquiring minds want to know! Howard K. Stern enabled which principle to do what? Which leads to my next question: Were the children's parents notified?

THE GRAMMARPHILE said...

Heh. Probably not a good idea to let any children around this dude...he seems rather shady! ;)