Wednesday, February 4, 2009

HUMP DAY GRAMMAR for February 4, 2009

There's so much going on here that I can't decide which is the funniest part--

1) The word "ejection" (I'm guessing they mean "ejaculation")

2) "Man hardly have another sex"--Borat? Is that you hanging around the Yahoo Answers site again?

3) "I saw in threesome, gal can take up two or up to four"--OK, I was an English major, and I'm not that great at math, but I thought that there were always three people involved in a threesome. Seems simple, right? If a "gal" takes two, then yes, 1 + 2 = 3. But if she takes four, 1 + 4 = 5. And that's a...fivesome? Whatever it is, I suspect it's not a threesome. It's a threesome plus two.

If you ever want to feel really, really intelligent...visit Red Pen, Inc. on Hump Day. Seriously.


Mrs. X said...

Hahaha, "ejection"! That gave me the weirdest mental picture of a guy being done with sex then pushing a big red button to open a skylight in the roof and ejecting out. Oh my, it's too early for me to be sharing my thoughts on these! :)


That's hilarious! Thanks for the chuckle, Mrs. X. :)

Borat Sagdiyev said...

What is this a Hump Day Grammars? Is for goat horse or camel? I just kidding! In a Khazakstan, Premier Nazarbamshev make most glorious ejection when finish with one of many wives. This because he has chram big like pepsi can. Waa Waa Wee Waa! He has a many wives to satisfy neverending desire to make sexy time. He is true Khazak hero! Khazak law say that each and every female must be make ready to satisfy Premier once they reach legal ages of 8 years or face penalty of crushings!


Borat, clearly Hump Day Grammar MUST be for camels. Goats and horses don't have humps...and camels have TWO humps! ;)

ChicagoLady said...

"She had great product other than guy"?

I'm not even going to ask!

LadyStyx said...


I don't know what is funnier, the entry or the comments!!!


@ ChicagoLady: Yeah, I saw that too and didn't wanna ask, either!


@ LadyStyx: I think the comments upstaged the post this time around! :)

Brian said...

I'm having such a hard time controlling myself on this one.

I think what he meant was four threesomes. None of the girls I've known in porn even start getting tired until about number five.

And if you went without sex for as long as this guy clearly has you would talk a little funny too.

Great line on Modern Marvels yesterday on one about bridge building.

"What we do with the large erection device..."

That reminds me. I've got to get mine into the shop for it's 20,000 lift servicing.


Brian, your theory on this guy talking funny because he hasn't had sex for a long time is really interesting... If that's really true, does that mean that if everyone just has lots more sex, bad grammar could be...eradicated?

Please, everyone, tell your friends*...GO HAVE LOTS AND LOTS OF SEX**. I like the idea of people having more sex leading to people using better grammar.

*: Only if their IQs are decent. Lord knows we don't need any more ignoramuses in situations where they could potentially create equally dumb offspring.

**: And please, use protection...unless you actually want to have a kid, of course. And in that case, just remember that training them on proper grammar is just as important as potty-training them; if you fail at either endeavor, you're inevitably gonna end up dealing with somethin' shitty! ;)

Yvie said...

I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that by "gal can take two, or up to four" they mean sex. ... Can take.. two or up to four of sex. Or in proper grammar land, she can have sex 2 to 4 times.

But it's just a theory.


Good translation, Yvie. That would make sense!

Brian said...

"...does that mean that if everyone just has lots more sex, bad grammar could be...eradicated?

Hold on. I see my neighbor's wife out front. She's going to have their second

Let me get back to you on that.


Oh, good. At least when my snarky ass goes to hell eventually, at least I know I'll have company!

EVula said...

I think is one of my favorite Hump Day posts, simply because it's so insanely screwed up.

I don't know why, but pretty much any time that an article is left out of a sentence, I find it that much funnier.


@ EVula: Yeah, I find those kinds of sentences to be funny, too. And there are SO MANY of those sentences over at Yahoo Answers!